RECORD OF MEETING
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN ISSUES TASK FORCE
DATE/TIME/PLACE:
Friday, February 25, 1994, 9:00 AM - 11:00 PM, CDTC Offices
IN
ATTENDANCE: John DiMura (NYS Thruway Authority), Emily H.
Goodman (private citizen), Karin Lang (CDRPC), Jerry Mueller (Green City
Transportation Council), Don Odell (Albany County Planning Department), Don
Robertson (NYSDOT - Region 1), Paul Russell (Town of Colonie), Bert Schou
(CDTA), Zimri Smith (Saratoga County Heritage Trail Committee), Steve Allocco
(CDTC)
DISCUSSION
SUMMARY
Summary
of Conference Results: The bicycle/pedestrian-related results of the
December New Visions conference were reviewed.
There was considerable support from conference participants for the Task
Force's continued efforts at developing a plan which truly "changes the
rules" regarding investment in bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. Conference participants deliberated on five issues
in this area:
* bicycle
and pedestrian infrastructure needs
* destination
treatments which would increase bicycle use
* actions
to enhance intermodal connections from foot or bike (particularly to
buses, but also to trains and planes)
* maintenance
practices which would allow for safer bicycle and pedestrian travel
* promoting
public education and awareness of the needs of and opportunities for
bicycle and pedestrian travel
There was
strong support for continued Task Force work on all but the last of these issues;
regarding education, many conference participants felt CDTC is not the most
appropriate body to conduct these efforts.
The
conference findings point to four desirable products for the Task Force to
develop:
1. A
set of standards for bicycle and pedestrian treatment based on area, roadway
and traffic characteristics (e.g., urban or rural area, traffic speeds and
volumes). Ideally, all infrastructure
projects pursued in the Capital District would have "add-on"
components providing the appropriate accommodations prescribed by these
standards.
2. A
set of "pilot corridor" projects, to be pursued under future
Transportation Improvement Programs as separate items rather than as
"add-ons," which would illustrate the merits of investing in bicycle
and pedestrian infrastructure.
3. A
discussion of maintenance practices which, if adopted by highway and public
works agencies, would enhance the safety and comfort of bicycle and pedestrian
travel.
4. A
designated regional bike network, including destination treatments (such as
racks or lockers) and intermodal connections, which would increase
opportunities to cycle for some or all of a trip.
Beyond
this list, Bert Schou volunteered to develop some bicycle/pedestrian-friendly
design guidelines for local planning boards to apply to the site plan review
process. This would accomplish part of
the education effort needed in the Capital District -- making local governments
and planners aware of the infrastructure needs of bicycle and pedestrian travel
at the site level.
Proposed
Work Program/Schedule for Phase Two: The draft document
mailed/faxed on February 22 was discussed.
There were some problems with the document's clarity; a revised version
will be sent out prior to the next meeting.
Particular items on the document prompted the following observations:
* Bicycle
and Pedestrian Treatment Standards:
It was suggested that if the State's forthcoming Highway Design Manual
incorporates the Federal Highway Administration's table(s) on bicycle
treatments (attached), it would be adequate and expedient to simply set forth these
standards for the Capital District rather than develop parallel standards of
our own. If the Task Force takes this
route, it will need to ascertain from localities that they will be able to
adhere to these standards as well, for while a good share of the
"average" Capital District trip is on State roads, most of these
trips eventually use the local system as well, and failure to have these
standards applied across all jurisdictions will result in gaps in the system of
bicycle facilities.
It
was noted that the Task Force should be able to at least in principle agree to
adopt the NYSDOT/FHWA standards at the March meeting. For example, the group could take the
attached FHWA standards and stipulate that "if the NYSDOT document does
not significantly alter these standards, we will use them in the Long-Range
Plan as well." As such, the
activity which had been scheduled for April would move up to March, May would
move up to April, and March (with exception of Work Program approval) would
move to May (see draft revised work program for further details).
* Designated
Bike Network: The group spent
some time discussing how to properly develop this network. The work of the Saratoga County Heritage
Trail Committee was discussed as a model for how to define the function and
placement of the network: the Committee
studied where people need to travel to and from (trip origins and
destinations), how they currently make these trips and how they would
under ideal conditions (that is, if adequate bicycle facilities were
available). Also, the Committee worked
to identify public lands which could be secured and improved for trail use; the
Task Force could perform a similar effort if it determines that new facilities
would have to be developed in order to bridge gaps in a completely
"on-street" network.
To
establish this network, the group will need to spend some time defining what
the network's role(s) is (are). How
extensive the network is will be a function of whether it is seen as providing
a few safer alternatives or, conversely, as providing levels of
"coverage" and access comparable to those of the existing roadway
system for automobiles.
Having
representatives of all four counties participate in network development will
also be important, ideally ensuring that local travel patterns and important
local access points (the latter such as to major worksites, parks, shopping and
educational centers) are reflected.
Special efforts will be made to bring residents and/or planning
professionals from Rensselaer and Schenectady County into the process, as these
two counties have not been represented at Task Force meetings to date.
* Pilot
Corridor Projects: The Task
Force initially discussed the notion that in order to get the sort of visibility
needed to make Capital District residents and government officials realize the
merits of these modes of travel, there should be one pilot project developed
for each county. After the meeting, one
member brought up the possibility of having two pilot projects in each
county -- one in an urban setting, one rural.
The Task Force will have to decide whether it can flesh out this many
projects in the time available (possibly by having members from each county work
on proposals for their own areas).
While
discussions during the course of the meeting tended to involuntarily center on
bicycle travel, it was suggested during a comment on pedestrian-friendly design
elements such as the median islands on State Street in downtown Albany that one
or more of the pilot projects should be more explicitly pedestrian oriented.
* Maintenance
Guidelines: There was little
discussion of this element of the Task Force's eventual recommendations during
the meeting. It was noted that ideas for
these guidelines will probably come up in the process of developing the
previous three products; thus, it seems that this element is best placed as the
last to be pursued during Phase Two.
Possible Technical Work in Support of Phase Two
Discussions
during this and previous Task Force meetings, as well as the draft work
program, suggested a number of staff tasks which would give the Task Force the
technical foundation it needs to develop its recommendations. In addition to collecting examples of
bicycle and pedestrian plans from other cities and regions (an effort which
is currently underway), the following are among the tasks which may be
undertaken in anticipation of Task Force working sessions on the various
elements of the recommendation set.
Task
Supported: Bicycle/Pedestrian Accommodation Standards
1. Preparation
of a listing of "local applications" of the FHWA (and/or NYSDOT)
tables of desired bicycle treatments by roadway traffic volume, operating speed
and other characteristics. For example,
application of these standards might imply a statement such as "the
desirable treatment for average cyclists on Balltown Road in Niskayuna is a six
foot wide shoulder."
2. Evaluation
of major intersections in the Capital District to determine where actions such
as restricting right turns on red or providing separate pedestrian signal
phases would be most beneficial.
Task
Supported: Designated Bike Network
1. Preparation
of a map of low-volume streets with potential for safest designation as parts
of bike routes.
2. Preparation
of maps of travel patterns -- city-to-city, intra-city and city-to-suburb --
particularly indicating where the shortest vehicle trips are. This would aid estimation of where latent
demand for bicycle/ pedestrian travel is greatest.
3. Preparation
of maps of streets with higher traffic volumes might bring out
indications of stretches of roadway for which development of alternate routes
are most critical.
Task
Supported: Pilot Corridor Projects
1. Preparation
of a map of travel patterns like #2 in the last section, but emphasizing the
emergence of corridors with consistently higher numbers of shorter trips
with greatest potential for conversion to bicycle/foot travel.
Task
Supported: Maintenance Practices
1. Preparation/mailing
of letter to highway and public works agencies asking for information on
current sweeping/plowing/rehabilitation practices, frequencies. Letter would emphasize that the group is
looking to see how these agencies' current resource and staffing levels
could better accommodate cyclists and pedestrians, rather than indicating that
recommendations on reallocations or expansions of their resources for
this purpose are being developed.
Task
Force members should feel free to raise suggestions of other desirable
technical efforts.
ACTION
ITEMS
* CDTC
to prepare clarified version of Work Program/Schedule with suggested task
sequence changes. Revised version to be
mailed out well in advance of next meeting; estimated mailing date March 9.
* Don
Robertson (NYSDOT) to look into status of NYSDOT Highway Design Manual; to
provide copy to CDTC for mailing in advance of next meeting if possible.
* Next
Task Force meeting: Tuesday, March 22,
5:30 - 7:30 PM, Colonie Community Center, 1653 Central Avenue (across from Lake
Electronics). Tentatively set for Room 21; whether
or not the room assignment changes, signs will be placed at the main entrance and
along the way to the proper room.
Meeting
agenda to include:
* Agreement
on Phase Two work program/schedule
* Discussion
of/agreement on FHWA/NYSDOT bicycle treatment standards; accept if possible.
* Discussion
of possible pedestrian treatment standards
* Begin
discussion of designated bike network