RECORD
OF MEETING
BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN
ISSUES TASK FORCE
DATE/TIME/PLACE:
August 25, 1993, 5:30-7:30 PM, Albany County Office Building Caucus Room
IN ATTENDANCE:
Brad Birge (CDRPC), Don Odell (Albany County Planning), Don Robertson
(NYSDOT - Region 1 Planning), Joann Ryan (City of Albany), Bert Schou (CDTA), Maggie
Vinciguerra (Hudson River Valley Greenway Communities Council), Steve Allocco
(CDTC)
DISCUSSION SUMMARY
Committee Membership:
Efforts to solicit the participation of additional parties were briefly
discussed; a final attempt to expand citizen representation on the Task Force
will be made this month.
Exploration of Issues and Options:
As a followup to the discussions of the July 28 meeting, a handout
grouping the various keywords or phrases raised at that meeting into five
"themes" was distributed.
These themes are as follow:
pursuing a modal "fairness" or "equality;"
intermodalism; tourism/recreation; institutional issues; and action tools. Also handed out was a summary of projected
future motor vehicle travel conditions based on CDTC's Systematic Traffic
Evaluation and Planning Model; the handout is intended to convey a sense of how
growing traffic congestion will present opportunities for bicycle and
pedestrian travel to "compete" on a travel time basis; however, it
also indicates that there will be increased hazards to bicycle/pedestrian
travel due to greater potentials for conflicts with motor vehicles.
The two meeting handouts, along with
a slightly revised version of the summary of the July 28 meeting, are attached for members who did not attend
the August 25 meeting.
The Task Force continued the last
meeting's "brainstorming" of issues and possible means of improving
the bicycle/pedestrian environment. The
meeting was oriented towards filling four large sheets of paper, labelled
"ISSUES," "GOALS," POLICY OPTIONS/POSSIBLE SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENTS" AND "NONBINDING SUGGESTIONS" with the appropriate
concerns or tools. Between the products
of this work (summarized on the attached pages) and those of the July meeting,
it appears that the Task Force is generating a thorough set of issues with
which to work, and a considerable number of actions to consider for
recommendation. Due to the number and
diversity of items raised to date, one of the key functions of the remaining
meetings prior to December will be to see a "weeding out" or
"restructuring" process in which issues are crystallized into a more
concise set.
Due to the small turnout, the issue
of selecting a Chairperson was again deferred.
Meeting/Logistical Issues:
Some type of mailout or telephone survey may become necessary to
establish a "most generally acceptable" combination of meeting time
and location. Downtown Albany is very
transit-accessible and proximate to large State employment centers, but summer
vacations may have confounded the experiment of using a downtown location. Furthermore, a number of Task Force
participants do not work in Albany. The
Town of Colonie Community Center (see "next meeting" below) has the
advantages of central location over downtown Albany and frequent transit
service over the CDTC offices; thus, it was decided to try that location for
the next meeting.
ACTION ITEMS
*
CDTC staff to explore potential for soliciting attendance of
Mohawk-Hudson Wheelmen members at future meetings through invitation in Bikeabout
newsletter.
*
Next meeting: Wednesday,
September 22, 1993, 5:30-7:30 PM, at the Town of Colonie Community Center, 1653
Central Avenue, Colonie (westbound side of Central Avenue, across from Lake
Electronics).
*
Agenda to include: Some further
brainstorming; working towards agreement on an authoritative "issues
list;" starting to look more critically/pragmatically at possible actions
to recommend.
RECOMMENDATION FOR PARTICIPANTS
As the group starts to close in on
the components of the December "white paper" on future conditions,
issues and possible solutions, it would be advisable for members to review the
materials distributed and any other materials available to make sure their own
"shopping lists" are put on the table for consideration. The September meeting could prove to be the
last meeting "feeding" development of the December paper at which
ideas would not be subjected to initial criticisms and/or possible
rejections. While there will always be
the opportunity for introduction of new ideas, the practical consideration of
keeping with the schedule will require a progression in the workings of the
group as well. Towards this end, any
materials which members would wish other members to review can be sent to CDTC
for duplication and distribution.
IDEAS/COMMENTS
RAISED DURING MEETING
Four "topic areas" were
focussed on during the meeting: issues,
goals, policy options/possible system improvements, and "nonbinding
suggestions." The aim of using
these areas was to direct Task Force members' thinking along the lines of what
will be required of the December reports.
The contents of each group were as follow (in order of occurrence in
discussions):
1. Issues
The overriding issues
which should drive development of the bicycle/pedestrian component of the
long-range Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).
a. The lack of
a bicycle/pedestrian "system map" aside from the map of the
Mohawk-Hudson Bikeway.
b. The need for
safe bicycle parking.
c. The lack of
publicity, both to encourage motorists to respect the rights of cyclists and
pedestrians and to encourage travelers to consider non-motor vehicle travel.
d. Access to
major facilities such as shopping centers, major employment sites,
colleges/universities and recreational facilities.
e. The need for
safe travel corridors during rush hours.
f. Inadequate
signage/the need for signage programs.
g. The need to
have traffic controls adequately accommodate pedestrian movements.
h. The need for
better enforcement of traffic laws.
2. Goals
The changes in
behavior, transportation planning approaches and resulting opportunities for
bicycle/pedestrian travel towards which the RTP should work.
a. Promote
traveler awareness of bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
i. Unleash latent demand1 for bike use, walking.
b. Promote
motorist awareness of and respect for cyclists'/pedestrians' rights.
c. Develop a
more thorough inventory of facilities, "trouble spots" (including a
sidewalk inventory).
d. Create
safer, more direct links to employment centers.
e. Foster
greater citizen/local government participation in system evaluation, problem
identification, development of solutions.
3. Policy
Options/Possible System Improvements
Tools which could be used either in
CDTC's RTP/TIP (Transportation Improvement Program) development or in
developing a regionwide "compact" aimed at adopting certain standards
or procedures which would enhance the bicycle/pedestrian environment. It should be noted that the main focus of the
current RTP update is to shape approaches for CDTC's Central Staff and
Planning/Policy Committee efforts; for the options or tools which would require
some kind of regionwide compacts, CDTC could serve as a facilitator for
discussions among representatives of the various Capital District
municipalities.
a. Regional
bicycle/pedestrian issues newsletter
b. Creation of
a "clearinghouse" for bicycle/pedestrian information and promotional
efforts
c. Greater
coverage of transit stops with bicycle racks
d. Make the
broadcasting of public service announcements (including those promoting bicycle
awareness/use) an element or requirement to be considered when cable companies'
license renewal applications are considered (free publicity/)
e. Include
thorough consideration/documentation of bicycle/pedestrian issues in project
development prior to TIP submission.
f. Possible
Enhancement Program proposal: facilities
inventory/planning study.
g. Regional
standards for shoulder width/construction type based on functional
classification and/or proximity to high trip generation sites (e.g.,
workplaces, residential subdivisions, shopping areas)
h. Corridor
preservation/right-of-way purchases for future trails.
i. Introduction
of traffic calming techniques -- traffic control and street design tools for
reducing motor vehicle volumes and travel speeds and increasing bike/pedestrian
safety.
j. Provision
of separate stop lines or signals for bicycles/pedestrians at major
intersections.
k. Add
protected bicycle/pedestrian facilities to the most direct links on the
existing arterial system (e.g., Routes 9 or 85).
4. "Nonbinding
Suggestions"
Options which would not be likely to
require official CDTC action or the development of any legal agreements among
or between municipalities. The
suggestions are a "shopping list" of ideas which CDTC could pass on
to local governments or pursue itself.
These concepts would further the goals of greater information on
conditions and greater opportunities for safe bicycle/pedestrian travel.
a. Use
Times-Union sports section pieces on outdoor activities to promote bike use or
use of bicycle facilities.
b. Bicycle
patrol officers' coalition.
c. Advise local
governments regarding possible zoning ordinance requirements which would
enhance the bicycle/pedestrian environment (e.g., distribution of model
ordinances).
d. Develop and
distribute street design/marking guidelines.
e. Develop and
distribute "bicycle/pedestrian-friendly" traffic control guidelines.
f. Take
advantage of opportunities to have student groups/"team project"
classes do field inventories.
g. Encourage
local radio/TV stations to broadcast public service announcements promoting
motorist awareness of bicyclists/pedestrians.
h. Develop a
regional greenway corridor plan (complement Hudson River Valley Greenway Plan).
i. Public
relations efforts using public officials to promote bike use, walking.
TO: Brad Birge
Don
Odell
Don
Robertson
Joann
Ryan
Bert
Schou
Maggie
Vinciguerra
FROM: Steve
Allocco
DATE: August
30, 1993
RE: August 25 Meeting Summary Material for Review
Enclosed please find a draft summary of the August
25 meeting. I've reproduced the items we
put on the plotter paper, along with adding a little narrative in an attempt to
capture the essence of the meeting and throwing a few ideas in (see the
"Recommendations for Participants" section of the meeting summary,
for example) I'd appreciate your
reviewing this material and suggesting any changes before I send it out to the
other Task Force members.
Just a reminder:
per our decision at the end of the meeting, I've reserved a meeting room
at the Colonie Community Center for Wednesday, September 22 from 5:30 to 7:30
PM.
Thanks again for a very productive meeting.
1"Latent demand" is defined as demand which is not currently
reflected in use of a mode of travel or of a facility. People who would bike to work if a safe route
or workplace showers were available but currently drive to work would be an
example of latent demand for bicycle travel.