STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS

Introduction

Making the vision a reality will require hard work on the part of government and the private sector.  Over 100 transportation actions were proposed by the New Visions task forces -- public outreach provided ideas for many more.  These actions have been grouped into broadly supported strategies, combined to reduce redundancy, and refined to reflect scopes appropriate to guide long range planning efforts.  Major policy choices regarding major investments for the region are discussed in the next chapter.

 

Text Box: Debate centers on relative priority in constrained budget times.The action strategies were reviewed during a lengthy public review period (12/95 through 6/96).  Based on the responses received, the number of strategies was reduced from seventeen to ten by combining common elements.  Some proposed actions -- namely those dealing with CDTC institutional structure such as the creation of permanent advisory committees or changing the composition of the governing board -- have been referred to the upcoming update of the CDTC's Prospectus (1997-2002).  With this exception, there appears to be little question about the desirability of implementing these strategies -- the debate centers on relative priority in constrained budget times.  The questions are more about how, who, how much and where -- not whether.

 

Each strategy narrative describes expected benefits and institutional and budgetary implications of adopting the strategy.  Then, recommended actions that would implement the strategy are listed.  Further detail on the impacts of the actions can be found in the 14-volume New Visions technical report series.

 

Greatest Concerted Effort

In addition to asking for comments on the strategies and candidate actions, the New Visions Workbook specifically asked for opinions on where the greatest concerted effort will be required for successful implementation.  Budgetary priorities when financial resources are constrained were also queried.  Some of the typical responses included here provide guidance and a dose of realism to strategy development and set the stage for the budget discussions that follow.

 

Significantly, every strategy proposed in the New Visions Workbook was considered by at least one respondent to require the greatest concerted effort.  This is one indication of the tremendous amount of work that implementing the strategies will require by CDTC, its member agencies, and its partners in the process.  Three strategies stand out, however, as ones where it is perceived that considerable concerted effort will be required:

 

·                  Reducing jurisdictional barriers,

·                  Ensuring transportation/land use compatibility,

·                  Pro-actively planning, and

·                  Providing appropriate transit service.

 

Text Box: Politically sensitive and concerted effort will be required to overcome jurisdictional barriers.Many of the New Visions task forces saw jurisdiction as a significant barrier to implementing recommended actions.  The goal of reducing jurisdictional and institutional barriers received considerable support during the outreach period.  However, reducing jurisdictional barriers was also widely perceived to be an area where substantial, focused effort will be required for progress to be seen.  CDTC's basic focus is to provide an effective transportation system to the region.  Where jurisdiction, either because of historic road ownership patterns, funding eligibility restrictions, or other reasons, creates a barrier to providing an effective transportation system, it needs to be addressed.  There are multiple creative ways to address these issues, as shown in the actions in this chapter.  Understanding that considerable concerted effort -- delivered in a politically sensitive manner -- will be required is realistic.

 

Another area where substantial staff resources will be required is improving transportation and land use compatibility through proactive planning.  "Perhaps the greatest concerted effort will be to get municipalities, where the power to regulate land use lies, to really consider transportation planning in their decisions."  (Donald R. Odell, New Visions Response Worksheet)  However, as Jack Reilly from CDTA put it, “This is a high staff time, high payoff effort.”

 

Donn Fichter, a NYSDOT retiree from the Transit Division, in citing the provision of appropriate transit service as a high-effort task, said "I foresee plenty of problems with items like labor rules, reliable funding, and coordination of agency paratransit."  This opinion was shared by others, citing the American "love affair" with the automobile, the difficulty in making transit competitive, and the institutional structure of human service transportation.

Budgetary Priorities and Funding for Strategy Implementation

"Unless we make sufficient investment for the future now, the result will be a decline in the quality of life in the region.  This lack of investment will be an opportunity lost and a very costly mistake."  Brian Zweig, New Visions Response Worksheets

 

"All of the strategies are necessary to make the whole work.  By eliminating any one strategy, you begin to compromise the desired goal and therefore the expected results.  Either (we) must work with available budget or find alternative funding sources if we are to accomplish what New Visions has laid the framework for."  Mary Burke, New Visions Response Worksheets

 

These two sentiments -- work within the budget, and do what is necessary to fully implement -- are reflected in the budget scenarios presented in the next chapter.  The interrelatedness of the strategies is also a point well taken.  The budget scenarios that follow this discussion of strategies look at preservation of the existing system, managing the system, and full implementation.  Outreach efforts revealed significant, but far from universal, support for increasing transportation revenues to implement important goals among stakeholders.  It is clear that raising new funding sources will require additional consensus-building, careful thought, and that success will depend on the specific mechanism chosen.  These issues are considered more fully in the Budget chapter.

 

List of Strategies and Actions

The following list summarizes the strategies [in brackets] and actions included in this chapter.

 

 


[1]  Maintain INFRAstructure in good Condition and Focus on Priority Treatment Networks for Other Improvements

 

1.   Make the Capital District transportation system safer. (p. 2)

 

2.   Continue adequate highway and bridge maintenance efforts. (p. 2)

 

3.   Carry out an effective highway and bridge rehabilitation and reconstruction program. (p. 2)

 

4.   Maintain transit equipment and facilities in a state of good repair. (p. 2)

 

5.   Embrace a "risk assessment" approach to capacity in infrastructure project design. (p. 2)

 

6.   Establish priority treatment networks for improvements beyond basic infrastructure renewal. (p. 2)

 

7.   Adopt an access management policy for the arterial priority network. (p. 2)

 

8.   Explore changes in road ownership as a way to better align infrastructure funding with function. (p. 2)

 

 

[2]  Pro-actively Plan Vibrant Communities

 

9.   Prepare and maintain a comprehensive Regional Development Plan. (p. 2)

 

10. Establish an Urban Service Area. (p. 2)

 

11. Provide funding for and staff participation in community-based planning. (p. 2)

 

12. Develop access management plans for all priority network arterials. (p. 2)

 

13. Support local planning board consideration of the regional transportation impacts of development decisions. (p. 2)

 

14. Improve site design practices. (p. 2)

 

15. Elevate consideration of transportation alternatives in siting facilities that primarily serve elderly and handicapped populations. (p. 2)

 

16. Improve delivery access for commercial vehicles. (p. 2)

 

17. Establish a program for transportation projects directed explicitly at community enhancement or regional economic development. (p. 2)

 

 

[3]  Reach Out for Full Participation

 

18. Emphasize public participation in transportation planning, programming and implementation. (p. 2)

 

 

[4]  Design Effective Facilities

 

19. Improve continuity between the planning, programming and design processes. (p. 2)

 

20. Mitigate congestion only when such improvements are consistent with adopted New Visions principles. (p. 2)

 

21. Routinely make road projects bicycle-, pedestrian- and transit-friendly. (p. 2)

 

22. Expand the regional road network to include greater use of service roads and collector streets. (p. 2)

 

 

[5]  Develop Intelligent Transportation Systems and Manage Traffic Incidents Effectively

 

23. Implement Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) on the priority network. (p. 2)

 

24. Implement the Expressway Incident Management Development Plan. (p. 2)

 

 

[6]  Support Intermodal Transportation

 

25. Improve intermodal passenger connections throughout the region. (p. 2)

 

26. Support intermodal transport of goods in and through the Capital District. (p. 2)

 

27. Improve surface access to the Port of Albany. (p. 2)

 

28. Implement improved surface access to the Albany County Airport. (p. 2)

 

29. Eliminate at-grade railroad crossings at every opportunity. (p. 2)

 

 

[7]  Provide Appropriate Transit Service

 

30. Restructure transit service to meet 21st century needs. (p. 2)

 

31. Support transit through design of the built environment and use of technology. (p. 2)

 

 

[8]  Treat All Modes Fairly in the Capital Program

 

32. Direct transportation improvements and services to support New Visions concepts. (p. 2)

 

33. Provide funding for implementation of small, cost-effective improvements. (p. 2)

 

34. Develop Class 1 bicycle facilities in major travel corridors of the region. (p. 2)

 

 

[9]  Enhance Demand Management

 

35. Continue and expand demand management initiatives. (p. 2)

 

36. Engage New York State as a full partner in parking management and transit promotion. (p. 2)

 

37. Consider highway pricing (particularly congestion pricing) and broad parking policies (including cashing out). (p. 2)

 

 

[10]      secure adequate funding to fully implement the plan

 

38. Build a coalition to advocate for regional transportation projects. (p. 2)

 

39. Explore local funding mechanisms for implementation of the plan. (p. 2)

 

40. Actively pursue public/private partnerships that leverage use of public funds. (p. 2)

 

41. Increase the use of mitigation fees to finance transportation improvements. (p. 2)

 

42. Include demand management and transit support in developer-financed traffic mitigation programs. (p. 2)

 

43. Explore changes in funding rules and programs to better align funding with function. (p. 2)