The trend forecasts in Error!
Reference source not found. presented a challenge to achieving the
stated New Visions goals. Reaching the vision
depends on the successful outcome of many initiatives and external events. These include:
1. Successful
implementation of physical, operational and institutional actions implied by
the New Visions principles and
specifically called for by the New Visions
strategies and actions.
2. Adequate
funding for full implementation of the New
Visions plan.
3. Complementary
state and national policy actions relating both to the Capital Region's
economic competitiveness and to subjects such as vehicle emissions and fuel
efficiency standards.
4. Complementary
private investment decisions in the Capital Region in the transportation system
(rail, air, intercity bus, trucking, communications), in workforce management
(telecommuting, demand management, transit pass support, etc.) and in the
location and design of residential, commercial and industrial development.
5. Complementary
private sector initiatives nationally and internationally to develop and market
cleaner, quieter, safer and more fuel-efficient cars and trucks.
Table 1 presents achievable performance objectives relative
to selected core performance measures; these objectives are achievable if the
five conditions stated above are achieved.
It is within the region's grasp to use a combination of transportation,
land use and other policies along with private actions and state and national
policies to preserve the current strengths of our regional transportation
system and address its weaknesses.
Table 1:
Performance Objectives for Core Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 2015 |
Year 2021 |
Year 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Plan |
Full Plan |
Full Plan |
|
|
Selected Core
Measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 Performance Goals |
1990 |
1996 |
2000 |
Improvement |
Improvement |
Improvement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Qualifications |
Conditions |
Conditions |
Conditions |
from 1996 |
from 1996 |
from 2000 |
|
|
Transportation
Service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCESS |
Percent of PM
Peak Hour Trips Transit Accessible |
|
|
|
Increase from
current levels |
18.60% |
na |
na |
aa |
na |
na |
* |
|||
|
|
Percent of PM
Peak Hour Trips With Transit Advantage |
|
|
|
Increase from
current levels |
0.40% |
na |
na |
aaaa |
na |
na |
* |
|||
|
|
Percent of PM
Peak Hour Trips Accessible by Bicycle |
|
|
|
Increse from
current levels, and |
28.9% (1995) |
na |
na |
aa |
na |
na |
* |
|||
|
|
|
and Walking |
|
|
|
|
|
improve quality
of facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCESSIBILITY |
Travel Time
between Representative Locations; |
|
|
|
As with
congestion measures, |
59 |
64 |
69 |
|
rr |
r |
|
|||
|
|
see Appendix; Sample Time: Selkirk
Yards |
|
|
|
maintain close
to current times |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
to Saratoga Springs (minutes, PM Peak) |
|
|
|
|
and increase
predictability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
||
|
CONGESTION |
Daily Recurring
Excess Person Hours of Delay |
|
|
|
Maintain close
to current levels |
6,546 |
16,999 |
26,344 |
r |
rrr |
aa |
* |
|||
|
|
Excess Person
Hours of Peak Hour Delay Per PMT |
|
|
|
Maintain close
to current levels |
1.1 |
2.4 |
3.2 |
a |
rrr |
a |
* |
|||
|
|
Daily Excess
Vehicle Hours of Delay by Truck |
|
|
|
Maintain close
to current per VMT |
||||||||||