CDTC's
existing commitments make a substantial contribution to pavement and bridge
conditions, preservation of transit services, intermodal connections and
strategic transportation improvements linked to land use plans. Honoring CDTC's commitments to strategic
transit and highway projects can best be accomplished by refining project
scopes and designs to fit with the New
Visions principles. Effective
transportation facilities accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians where
appropriate, address the needs of an aging society, provide for goods movement
and delivery, and reduce conflicts between local and through traffic. Community compatibility is as important as
moving traffic under this definition of effectiveness. Multiple objectives are embraced in major projects, rather than primary
focus on physical condition or traffic capacity in the design process.
Being more creative -- trying new approaches using the principles
developed from New Visions -- will
make existing resources go further.
Modest, but noticeable benefits will accrue to almost every aspect of
transportation system performance, most notably the condition of the region's
infrastructure, and improved user and societal costs.
Significant institutional changes will be required from all levels of
government to successfully implement this strategy. The budgetary implications assume a degree of making better use
of existing revenues. Full
implementation of this strategy goes beyond "system preservation" and
will likely require dedicated transportation fund sources over those projected
from existing sources. Please refer to
the Budget chapter for further information.
Highway project design has historically
been conducted in a step-wise fashion -- after planning but before
construction. Connections to both
involved "hand-offs" between departments, agencies, or
contractors. A systems approach uses a
team of planners, designers, and construction personnel to develop
projects. Project-specific decisions are
put in the context of overall transportation system policy, goals, and budget
constraints. Consistency in treatment
between projects is improved.
Implementing actions include:
·
Revise NYSDOT’s
project scoping and development procedures manual to allow increased
flexibility in the application of AASHTO standards on non-NHS routes;
·
Increase
involvement of NYSDOT design personnel and city engineering departments in
planning processes;
·
Increase
inter-agency communication; and
·
Provide more
effective (earlier, more frequent) public participation in project design.
Existing
staff resources at CDTC, NYSDOT, and other affected agencies can be reallocated
to allow more project development to occur prior to
"engineering". The time
allotted to developing alternative treatments is increased at the conceptual
stage -- but many fewer alternatives are advanced to detailed study. This approach reduces delays resulting from
litigation and unfavorable public reaction by reaching agreement at the
conceptual stage -- before a lot of engineering resources have been
invested. Support for the project
alternative builds in the process. Both
project development time and costs are reduced in the end because mistakes are
avoided. Essentially, more project
design happens "up front" thus extending the planning process, but
smoothing implementation.
New
Visions represents a fundamental
change from "business as usual" at the same time that it builds on a
strong foundation of regional cooperation, sound planning and participatory
decision-making. Throughout the work of
the task forces (Phase 2) and the outreach period (Phase 3), continued support
for existing commitments was heard.
People generally agreed with the priority assigned to infrastructure
maintenance, the congestion management approach, and supported specific
projects like Albany International Airport access and the Selkirk Bypass. While this strategy stresses a creative
approach to these projects, the fact that a fundamental commitment to
delivering on promises made in the past should not be lost.
Arterial spacing is inadequate in the Capital
District because of suburban development unaccompanied by highway investment. Currently programmed infrastructure and
capacity improvements can help restore mobility function to major arterials by
encouraging through trips to avoid residential corridors. Concurrent judicious use of traffic signals
along residential corridors carrying more than 15,000 vehicles per day will
improve their safety, the efficient movement of traffic and pedestrians, and
overall livability. Modeled after
Western and Washington Avenues in the city of Albany, actuated traffic signals
can provide for progressive movement of traffic at a definite speed and
interrupt traffic at regular intervals to permit pedestrians or other vehicles
to cross.
Some projects on the current TIP are appropriate candidates for the
incorporation of bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Issues task
force's Technical Report identifies 52 TIP (1994-99 TIP) projects that have
this potential. The ensuing discussion
in this report is not intended to put the responsible agencies "on the
spot", but rather to offer examples of what might be done within existing project scopes to more fully
incorporate bicycle and pedestrian travel.
Beyond projects listed in the current TIP, this action anticipates
further strategic intersection improvements and limited road widening when
consistent with New Visions principles. The magnitude of these future projects is
expected to be considerably less than that of the 1994-99 TIP however.
Priority networks (Action 6 on page 84) state the region's important facilities for
upgrades for non-auto modes. Beyond
these priority facilities, improving the "friendliness" of the
transportation system to people who want to walk, bike and take transit also
requires attention. This does not mean
that sidewalks should be put along rural roads or bike lanes striped where they
are not warranted. It does mean,
however, that on the priority network, lack of inclusion of bicycle and
pedestrian design features must be justified, and off the priority network,
these features should be considered and included where it makes sense to do so.
Transportation
system enhancements, such as improved lighting, bicycle and pedestrian
accommodation, and transit amenities (bus shelters, park and ride lots, and
pullouts) help remedy past and prevent future disruptions caused by
transportation infrastructure. In
addition to enhancing community appearance, incorporating generous amounts of
green space and mature plantings can partially mitigate existing and worsening
traffic/land use conflict. When
employed effectively, landscape features can also help slow traffic through
residential corridors, which increases safety, particularly for pedestrians and
bicyclists. Native landscaping
materials further minimize disruption to the ecosystem, and are particularly
important to use in environmentally sensitive areas such as the Albany Pine
Bush.
Transit trips are essentially extensions of walk trips. Both within existing developed areas and in
newly developing areas, the safety, ease and convenience of pedestrian and bike
access to transit is a significant factor influencing the potential success of
bus or rail service. Transit amenities can
make a big difference in transit ridership.
There is strong evidence that time spent waiting for a bus is perceived
more negatively than time spent traveling.
Minimizing the negative connotations of waiting can be accomplished by
the incorporation of bus shelters into the design of new or redeveloped
sites. The addition of adequately
sized, architecturally compatible shelters in major transit corridors and
provision of additional, smaller shelters throughout the service area will also
help. All bus stops should have a
minimum of a paved waiting surface and safe access. Sidewalks along bus routes and leading to bus stops, crosswalks,
lighting, shelters and benches, bike racks on buses, and better snow removal and
street maintenance practices are also needed.
As
TIP projects are designed, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit accommodations
should be aggressively considered.
Sidewalks, pedestrian actuated traffic signals, and mid-block pedestrian
crossings need to be present along a much greater percentage of streets and
highways than is the case today for noticeable effects to be seen. Furthermore, these accommodations must serve
mobility-impaired people and wheelchair users.
Well-marked crosswalks across eight lanes of traffic don't do much good
if signal timing is not sufficient to cross safely and/or a median refuge is
not provided. In some cases, looking
beyond the project limits will be required in order to accommodate bicycle and
pedestrian travel. A classic example of
this concern is found in areas where developers are required to install
sidewalks along roads in front of their projects. The sidewalks end at the property limits, and pedestrians walk in
the road for at least part of their journey.
In some cases, bicyclist accommodation on a parallel or separate
facility may be preferable to a wide shoulder on a busy state highway.
Traffic calming is an umbrella term for a variety of actions ranging from
allowing on-street parking to installing speed bumps or speed tables to street
closures. Traffic calming reduces
dangerous conflicts between cyclists/pedestrians and motor vehicles and creates
a comfortable balance between motor vehicle and non-motor vehicle
activity. These actions make a street
or area less attractive to cars, although only the most aggressive applications
actually prohibit car use. When traffic
calming occurs, motorists determine new "best routes" and traffic
works towards a new equilibrium.
Communities can advance traffic calming plans at modest cost, and if
properly designed, at limited impact on regional mobility.
Traffic
calming steps can be included in road projects where appropriate and justified
by conflict indices. This will not
necessarily result in more traffic congestion; CDTC investigations have
suggested that a carefully planned traffic calming effort can maintain or even improve the efficiency of motor vehicle
circulation in an area. Residential and
mixed-use corridors and neighborhoods are the most appropriate places to apply
traffic calming techniques.
Providing additional travel choices connects communities in new
ways. Children will significantly
benefit from this approach. Instead of
being chauffeured, they will be able to be more self-sufficient, as long as the
alternatives provided are safe, affordable, and convenient.
Frontage or service roads are currently located
along Wolf Road, Washington Avenue Extension, NY 146 in Clifton Park, parts of
New Scotland Road, and other places in the region. They provide access to residential and commercial properties in
these heavily traveled corridors.
Additional use of this arterial management technique will make the
entire transportation system more effective.
It should be pursued aggressively in corridors where land is available
for cost-effective implementation.