Capital District
Transportation Committee
REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION COORDINATION COMMITTEE
RECORD OF MEETING
DATE/TIME: Wednesday
ATTENDANCE: Luis Acosta—CDTA;
STUDY DISCUSSION SUMMARY: After introductions, Deb Stacey from CDTC and Kristina Younger from CDTA described the purpose creating the Regional Transportation Coordination Committee. Subsequent to that discussion, the outline was followed for additional discussion items:
Safetea-Lu
Requirements:
a. Interim Guidance—The March 15th Federal Register contains the Interim Guidance with respect to the coordination of the JARC, New Freedom and Section 5310 programs. CDTA and CDTC staffs have some concerns regarding the guidance and will be drafting letters to voice these concerns. The public comment period ends May 20th. The comment letters will be shared with the RTCC. Very generally, CDTC and CDTA have questions regarding the role of the designated recipient, the solvency of the JARC program, the expectations of the coordinated plan and the distribution of the New Freedom money allocated to Saratoga Springs.
b. Designated Recipient—CDTA is the designated recipient for JARC funds. CDTA created a four county JARC Planning Committee that has helped program the funds for a variety of innovative transit projects. The interim guidance does not explicitly provide for transit agencies to be the designated recipient of New Freedom funds, but mentions that perhaps the MPO could take over this function. CDTC has no interest in assuming this role but has offered to take over the “JARC” committee, expand it and manage the expanded coordination committee (RTCC).
c. Coordinated Plan—The guidance indicates that recipients of JARC, New Freedom and 5310 funds must certify that projects selected were derived from a “locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan”. It further states that the “plan” must be derived from a process that includes representatives of public and non-profit transportation human service providers, participation by the public and participation from those representing the needs of welfare recipients and eligible low-income individuals. CDTC proposes to take charge of this item.
d. Proposed
Approach--The proposed process would be to expand the JARC committee (into the
RTCC), document all coordination activities that have taken place in the
Capital District over the last decade or so (1989 Human Service Agency Survey,
JARC, United We Ride,
Access to Jobs:
a. CST
Funding Update—CST funds were cut from the Governor’s budget, but are part of a
legislative line item—the future of CST funding is still very much up in the
air. CST monies have been used to pay
for the transit pass program, which provides passes to the county
b. JARC Funding Update—JARC funding has become a formula based appropriation, and is no longer distributed as a competitive discretionary program. This means that CDTA will see their JARC funding cut in half from previous allotments. The current grant allocation will continue the program as is (3 trip planners and brokered taxi rides for safety net situations) through calander year 2007.
DDPC Funding Opportunity:
a. Albany County
Other:
a. United We Ride—The next meeting of the United We Ride group is scheduled for Wednesday May 17th. Two stakeholder group meetings were held in April and May and were very well attended. A working group was formed to explore options for a third entity to provide maintenance services, loaner vehicles, technical assistance or even take over their whole transportation operations.
The next meeting of the Regional Transportation
Coordination Committee is scheduled for Wednesday