I. Organizational Structure
“23 U.S.C. and
Section 8 of the Federal Transit Act ... require that a Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) be designated for each urbanized area and that the
metropolitan area has a continuing, cooperative and comprehensive
transportation planning process that results in plans and programs that
consider all transportation modes and supports metropolitan community
development and social goals.”
23 CFR Section 450.300
![]()
he Capital District
Transportation Committee Policy Committee (CDTC) is the designated MPO for
the “
The CDTC had its origins in the Capital
District Transportation Study (CDTS), set up in 1965 through agreements
involving
According
to 2000 Census urbanized area population, CDTC is the
fourth-largest MPO in
The CDTC Planning Area Boundaries
|
Figure
1: |
CDTC’s Metropolitan Planning Area Boundary (MPA) is the primary focus of CDTC’s study efforts. The MAB is one of four boundaries with which the MPO must deal in the transportation planning process.
1)
Census Urbanized
Area (UZA). The smallest of the boundaries is the
UZA. After each decennial Census, the
Bureau of the Census establishes a Census Boundary for each urbanized area and
provides maps showing what communities (or parts thereof) compose the urbanized
population. The UZA sets the urbanized
area’s population for apportionment of FHWA’s STP-attributable and FTA’s
Section 5307 funds. After the UZA is
available, the MPO may adjust this boundary outwards for its own purposes.
2)
FHWA Urban Area
Boundary (UAB) is the next boundary. Using
the Census UZA as a starting point, the MPO may smooth and adjust the UZA
outwards to better reflect area’s transportation needs. Adjustments are
routinely necessary because the Census’ UZA boundaries solely reflect
population density and thus do not usually include some significant facilities
(e.g., airports or parks). For an MPO to
adjust the UZA boundary outward, there must be
agreement among “the responsible State and local officials in cooperation with
each other.”[3] This adjusted boundary (UAB) serves many
purposes. It is the official “urban/rural” boundary for FHWA purposes; it is
important for highway functional classification, roadway design standards, FHWA
eligibility for improvements, Emergency Relief funding eligibility, and outdoor
advertising control[4].
The adjusted boundary is subject to approval by the Secretary of
Transportation.
Following the release of the 2000 Census UZA,
CDTC reviewed and made appropriate adjustments thereto to form its UAB. The NYSDOT submitted the revised UAB to FHWA
and FTA on

3)
Metropolitan
Planning Area Boundary (MPA) – this is the
geographical area in which the MPO’s transportation planning process is carried
out. The MPA is to encompass the UAB plus any area that the MPO anticipates to
become urbanized in 20 years.[5] The MPO and the
Governor must agree on the MPA.[6] In December 2003, the CDTC reaffirmed that its planning area
boundary (MPA) remained unchanged - all of
4) Air Quality Nonattainment/Maintenance Area Boundary - In air quality nonattainment/maintenance areas, the MPA
(above) must include the entire nonattainment area – unless the Governor and
the MPO agree otherwise[7]. In the Capital District,
the Governor and the MPO did agree otherwise.
When EPA
classified the Capital District region was in nonattainment for ozone in 1992,
it identified all six counties in the Albany Metropolitan Statistical Area -
the four urban counties (
CDTC Structure and Membership
|
Figure
3: CDTC Committee Structure |
The
CDTC has used the term “Policy Board” rather than “Policy Committee” for a
number of years to reduce the amount of confusion over the term
“committee”. The Policy Board is
composed of the principal elective officials of general purpose local
government, as well as the principal officials of regional and State
transportation agencies (see Table 1).
The 25-member Policy Board operates by consensus, emphasizing mutual
agreement. All CDTC voting members have
an equal vote (i.e., virtual veto) over any major decision affecting them. The majority of Policy Board members are
non-State, as there are only two State voting members: the NYSDOT and the NYS Thruway
Authority. The Policy Board members
work very well with each other and with the other municipalities, community
groups, interest groups and the central staff.
CDTC’s cooperative working relationship is unparalleled among New York
MPOs and reflects the true intent of the 3C planning process.
We noted earlier that CDTC – then named CDTS - was
designated as the MPO for the Capital District area in 1974. Usually as the transportation system matures
over the years, MPO policy boards often have not expanded their membership to
address new major modes of transportation within the area. The federal regulations state that the MPO
designations and voting memberships that were in existence prior to
|
Table 1. Capital District Transportation Committee |
|
|
Entity |
Representation |
|
Counties (8) |
Albany
County Executive; Albany County Legislature; Rensselaer County Executive;
Rensselaer County Legislature (chair); Schenectady County Board of
Representatives (chair); Member-at-large named by Schenectady County Board of
Representatives; Saratoga County Board of Supervisors; Member-at-large named
by Saratoga County Board of Supervisors |
|
Cities and Towns (9) |
City of
Albany (Mayor); City of Cohoes (Mayor); City of Troy (Mayor); City of
Schenectady (Mayor); City of Mechanicville (Mayor); City of Saratoga Springs
(Mayor); City of Watervliet (Mayor); City of Rensselaer (Mayor); Town of
Colonie |
|
Other
Local (2) |
At-large town representative(s) and/or At-large village
representative(s). These are chosen
annually. |
|
Regional Bodies (4) |
Capital
District Transportation Authority; Capital District Regional Planning
Commission; Albany Port District Commission; |
|
State Agencies (2) |
NYS
Department of Transportation; NYS Thruway Authority |
|
Federal Agencies (2) (non-voting) |
Federal
Transit Administration (Region 2) |
All CDTC voting members have an equal vote
(i.e., virtual veto) over any major decision affecting them. CDTC evaluated and rejected the concept of
weighted voting, believing that it might be counterproductive to a cooperative
process wherein all parties feel free to fully disclose their plans/ programs
without the fear of being outvoted for purely parochial
interests. The Policy Board meets four
times a year.
Under
the Policy Board is the CDTC Planning Committee, which is responsible
for developing the UPWP and the TIP.
Like the Policy Board, the Planning Committee includes wide
representation from the State, Regional, City and local municipalities -
usually represented by the technical counterparts of the Policy Board
members. Besides the Planning Committee,
CDTC has several subcommittees (e.g., Administrative and Financial Standing
Subcommittee) and numerous working groups/task forces (e.g., Bicycle/Pedestrian
Task Force, Goods Movement Task Force).
Additional work groups are formed for special studies, such as the New
Visions 2030 Plan. Planning
Committee meetings are held monthly.
Agreements and Contracts
Federal
legislation (23 U.S.C. 134) requires the MPO to work in cooperation with the
State and public transportation agencies in carrying out a continuing,
cooperative, and comprehensive (3C) metropolitan planning process. These
agencies are allowed to determine their mutual roles and responsibilities, and
they develop procedures governing their cooperative efforts. These working relationships must be formally
established, usually through agreements or memorandum of understanding between
the MPO and the State, and between the MPO and the public transit operators.[9] The regulations state that a Prospectus
may be used to satisfy the above requirements.[10]
The CDTC's basic document
defining the roles and responsibilities of the various parties is its five-year
Continuing Operations Plan (Prospectus) 1990-1995, which was adopted in
December 1990. CDTC recognizes that the Prospectus
needs refreshing. CDTC has current
versions of all sections of the prospectus but have not formally issued a
revised document. CDTC intends to
prepare a new prospectus as soon as the new federal legislation – including any
changes in MPO requirements - is issued.
CDTC also wants to see how the Transformation
process plays out in regard to NYSDOT’s respective roles and responsibilities
vis-à-vis the MPO process. We do note
that CDTC issues a very informative “Reference Guide to the Capital District
Transportation Committee”, which details the purpose of the MPO, how it is
structured, member agencies, roles and responsibilities, and so on. This Guide
is updated annually, the last update being July 2003. CDTC also has additional documents that
describe the MPO responsibilities and working relationships: NYSDOT/CDTA agreements and the CDTC-CDTA
Memorandum of Understanding.

Since CDTC is within an air
quality nonattainment area, Federal regulations also require two other
agreements/arrangements relating to CDTC nonattainment area. These arrangements are discussed in Section
XII Air Quality.
|
Figure
4: CDTC Reference Guide |
Recommendation:
·
CDTC should update its Prospectus as soon as future NYSDOT
interaction with the MPO is better known and new Federal legislation is
available.
[1] This represents a name change by the Census
Bureau following the 2000 Census. The
previous name of this urbanized area was the “
[2] Following the 1980 Census, the
[3] 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(37)
[4] Visible advertising signs adjacent to the Interstate system and
highways designated as part of the primary system on
[5] 23
U.S.C. 134(c)(2)
[6] 23 U.S.C. 134(c)(1)
[7] 23 CFR 450.308(a)
[8] 23 U.S.C. 134 (b)(4)
[9] 23 CFR 450.310(a) and (b)
[10] 23 CFR 450.314(c)