RECORD
OF MEETING
BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN
ISSUES TASK FORCE
DATE/TIME/PLACE:
October 21, 1993, 9:00-11:00 AM, CDTC Offices
IN ATTENDANCE:
Brad Birge (CDRPC), John DiMura (NYS Thruway Authority), Barbara
Goldstein (NYS Department of State), Don Odell (Albany County Planning), Jeff
Olson (NYSDOT - Central Office Planning), Luke Rich (NYS Senate Committee on
Tourism, Recreation and Sports Development) Don Robertson (NYSDOT - Region 1
Planning), Paul Russell (Town of Colonie Department of Environmental Services),
Joann Ryan (City of Albany Planning Department), Bert Schou (CDTA), Maggie
Vinciguerra (Hudson River Valley Greenway Communities Council), Steve Allocco
(CDTC)
DISCUSSION SUMMARY
The objective for the meeting was to
assemble the "raw material" needed for the December conference's
white paper. A brief discussion of the
conference agenda and goals framed the context in which the paper would be
presented; a shell of the paper was then used as a "workbook" for
identification of points to be made.
DECEMBER CONFERENCE
The first of three "New
Visions" conferences will be held on Tuesday, December 14, from 8:00 AM to
5:00 PM at the Desmond Hotel on Albany Shaker Road in Colonie. The aim is to bring together as many members
of the nine task forces as possible, along with other interested public agency
staff and the general public, to discuss the range of issues being considered,
what the region's priorities should be, and any other directions in which the
task forces should be looking.
Mechanics:
Each task force will present its background paper, and then a series of
small group discussions will take place to hammer out priority lists to bring
back to the full conference. The small
groups will consist of mixes of task force members -- for example, there will
not be a "Bicycle/Pedestrian Task Force" table but, rather,
Bicycle/Pedestrian group members will be sitting with Infrastructure, Urban
Issues, Expressway and other task force members and identifying the conflicts
and similarities in their priorities. By
the day's end, attendees should have a good indication of what the emerging
regional priorities are and how their own task forces' efforts should address
these priorities.
Rather than CDTC staffers, the
conference plan calls for the papers to be presented by task force
members. It was proposed and agreed to
that Don Odell would present the Bicycle/Pedestrian Task Force paper. In the remaining two meetings, the group will
reach agreement on the paper's contents and give Don some direction on points
to emphasize in his presentation.
Administrative Notes:
A flyer providing additional information on the conference will be sent
out with the draft December paper; as it will indicate, the cost of attending
the conference is $20, and includes lunch, printed materials (including copies
of all task force papers) and morning and afternoon refreshment breaks. A limited number of scholarships covering the
attendance fee are available; those interested in getting a scholarship should
write a short (2-3 sentences is adequate) letter to CDTC requesting one and
explaining the circumstances.
It is expected that between 200 and
250 people will attend the conference; conference space is limited to 250
registrants, and all conference attendees must be pre-registered (there
will be no walk-in registrations).
WHITE PAPER
The group worked to fill in a shell
of the report, recalling points raised in past meetings and referring to lists
of issues and possible policy/programmatic options developed in these meetings. Following the style of the draft Urban Issues
Task Force report included in the October 4 mailing, the group identified a
number of elements to include in the report.
The draft report (to be transmitted soon after this summary) will
reflect this work, as will the series of bullet lists labelled
"Bicycle/Pedestrian Task Force Overheads," the latter of which will
be used during the conference to highlight the group's main ideas. The remainder of this section briefly
discusses the philosophies or themes the group set forth in trying to develop
each part of the report.
Overarching philosophy:
The group's discussions suggested a working principle of educating
Capital District municipalities as to the great potential benefits of
bicycle/pedestrian-related investments, a good number of which would not even
require public expenditure (developer-provided bicycle and pedestrian
amenities, for example). Using examples
from other areas, the case should be made that we can achieve meaningful
reductions in single-occupant vehicle travel and enhance the overall quality of
life in the Capital District. Also, we
need to point out attributes of the region which are either conducive to
promotion of bicycling and walking or are challenges to address, such as the
following:
Conducive Elements
* the high
percentage of all peak hour trips which are five miles or less in length (the
generally accepted limit in identifying candidates for conversion from private
auto to bicycle use). On a related note,
* the location
of a number of major employment, educational and shopping areas in relatively
close proximity to dense residential areas, raising the potential for a
significant increase in cycling/walking through modest-cost, small-scale
strategic improvements
* growing
traffic congestion's serving as a disincentive to single-occupant vehicle use
Challenges
* overcoming
the notion that cycling and walking as forms of transportation are "good
weather" modes usable for only a small part of each year
* meeting the
needs of an aging population requiring special consideration with regard to
pedestrian travel in particular -- adequate crossing time at intersections,
better quality walking areas, and more direct walking routes to shopping areas
and services, for example
The group has some "pilot
corridor" concepts which may serve as important early examples of how to
use strategic, relatively low-cost applications of the principles to
demonstrate the value of investing in bicycle/pedestrian facilities and
programs.
Introductory Points:
The primary sentiment appeared to be that the Capital District needs to
bring cycling and walking into play as real components of the transportation
system, given the reality that not everyone wants to or can use a
car. The group appears to want to
emphasize the simple logic of enhancing the bicycle/pedestrian
environment, pointing out the cost-effectiveness of such investments, the way
in which doing so would benefit our aging population and promote the social
goal of equal access. It was established
by the group that as it is dealing with the most undersupported modes of travel
in the Capital District, it may be necessary to be a bit "pushy" or
to otherwise employ the "hard sell" approach to get the other task forces
to recognize the importance of more thorough consideration of
bicycle/pedestrian issues and possible accommodations.
Current Conditions:
As just noted, these are the two most undersupported modes of travel in
the Capital District. Perhaps as a
consequence, there is not a lot of reliable data to use in presenting a quantitative
picture of the bicycle/pedestrian environment.
As such, it is arguably the group's prerogative to skimp on a discussion
of current conditions, instead using the present environment -- in general
terms -- as a reference in a "today is bad, 2015 will be worse due to X
and Y" vein of reasoning. The
current conditions discussion of the report thus will present the basic
material suggested in the handout -- Census journey-to-work information and a
brief inventory of major bicycle/pedestrian facilities -- necessary to
"set up" this sort of argument.
Information on urban corridor motor vehicle travel speeds should also be
presented to summarize the performance of what is, in essence, "the
competition" (single-occupant motor vehicle travel).
Year 2015 Trend Conditions:
Again without much to use along the lines of numbers, the group
emphasized presenting its view of the future from a quality of life
standpoint. With development trends
continuing as they are expected to, growing congestion and the ongoing
development of residential and employment areas in a manner that effectively isolates
them from bicycle and pedestrian access (at least to the degree that these are
no longer safe, comfortable means of local travel) would further expand the
Capital District without expanding significantly the opportunities
available for cyclist and pedestrian circulation and use of available
recreational, shopping and cultural amenities.
Building up the Capital District has often served to either cut some
people off from opportunities or otherwise simply perpetuate the
anti-bicycle/pedestrian travel environment.
Bicycle/Pedestrian Issues for the
RTP to Address: The group was in agreement that perhaps the
most effective presentation of an issues list to the conference would come from
consolidating the entire list of 11 suggested issues into five or so to be put
on the conference overhead transparencies.
As part of this consolidation, the thrust of Issue 10, "inadequate system
of bicycle/pedestrian facilities," would be changed to "need for a
continuous network of bicycle/pedestrian facilities" to emphasize a
retrofitting and "elimination of barriers" approach; otherwise, the
old wording could be interpreted as emphasizing creation of new facilities
(which in the best case would come about at a very gradual rate) instead of
working to appropriately accommodate cyclists and pedestrians on the existing
street and highway system. It was also
suggested that intermodal linkages be highlit.
A first-cut consolidation of the remaining issues will be indicated in
this section of the draft report.
Initial List of Policy/Programmatic
Options
As the meeting reached its end, the
group was just beginning to review the 5 possible policies and 13 possible
programs detailed in the list. Five
options (two of which would be consolidated) were early "likely
prospects" to include, and are indicated in the draft report. It will be necessary to spend some time at
the next meeting continuing "initial group consideration" of these
candidates and identifying a group to present at the conference. Two modifications/additions of candidates
were set forth:
Program 10: expand with second sentence "Also,
provide for linkage with town-to-town transit."
Program 14 (new): Connect local plans and improvements to major
regional/statewide tourism initiatives.
OTHER ITEMS
In addition to the meeting handouts,
Bert Schou provided a copy of an article on bikeways in the October issue of
the American Planning Association's Planning magazine; it presents a
good capsule summary of the particulars of bikeway design, current examples of
bikeway plans newly adopted or under development, and the costs and benefits of
bikeways found in recent evaluations. A
copy of this article is enclosed along with some thoughts Bert has on the
contents of the Master Plan CDTC is in the midst of developing.
ACTION ITEMS
* Members to
review October 21 meeting handouts, particularly "menus" of issues
and policies/programs, to identify any other points to be raised in background
paper.
* Next
meeting: Thursday, November 7, 1993,
3:00-5:00 PM, CDTC Offices, 5 Computer Drive West, Colonie.
* Proposed
Meeting Agenda/Sequence:
- brief summary
discussion of draft report
- completing
development of policy/program option list
- return to discussion
of paper, overall, and overheads